Hosting for the holidays is noone's obligation - pressofAtlanticCity.com: Life

Hosting for the holidays is noone's obligation - pressofAtlanticCity.com: Life

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Hosting for the holidays is noone's obligation

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, December 1, 2012 12:01 am

Question: Our family includes 20-plus people, most on my husband's side. For years my mother or I hosted Christmas, and my husband's mother or sister hosted Thanksgiving. Five years ago, my sister-in-law announced she was neither attending nor hosting Thanksgiving. Her family of four still attends Christmas, as does my husband's brother's family (seven people) who live across the state. My mother-in-law is now too old to host.

This leaves my mother, 72, hosting the smaller gathering every Thanksgiving (and inviting my mother-in-law) and me hosting every Christmas for 20-plus people.

I'm having trouble with why my sister-in-law can't have us over for Thanksgiving. She doesn't work; I have a career. Her children are grown; mine are still living at home. I am happy to host Christmas, but I think she should host Thanksgiving instead of my elderly mother. I don't think absenting herself from Thanksgiving means never having to reciprocate for Christmas.

Part of the reason this burns me up is my husband's family has always treated me like I'm "difficult" and my sister-in-law is the "nice" one. I think I'm being pretty nice, having everyone over when they never invite me anywhere. Is there anything I can say to try to get her to step up? Am I being difficult? - Anonymous

Answer: No, just a bit myopic.

I certainly understand your frustration. But you've essentially roasted this down to, "I'm stuck with Christmas, so stick her with Thanksgiving." That's treating things as compulsory that aren't, and making decisions for others that aren't yours to make.

Your sister-in-law had every right to quit Thanksgiving. It's her time, her kitchen, her choice. Before you argue that it wasn't all about her, as it heaped the work onto your mom, remember: Your mom didn't have to step into the breach. She could have said instead, "Maybe it's time to downsize/go to a restaurant."

I appreciate that busting a we-do-this-every-year tradition is sacrilege to some people, particularly for heads of family like your mom and mother-in-law. I also get your scapegoat concerns. But none of these changes the fact that your sister-in-law doesn't make you cook, you choose to.

You have determined it's more important to keep accommodating 20-plus guests than it is to invite blame for canceling Christmas. Know this: You are just as entitled to quit Christmas as your sister-in-law was entitled to quit Thanksgiving. If you don't want to quit, then own that; don't distribute blame.

What I don't suggest you touch with a 10-foot turkey baster is the idea your sister-in-law's employment, maternal responsibilities and status in the family - on their own or relative to yours - have any place in this discussion. In fact, you'll get a lot further in your quest to rid yourself of the "difficult" tag if you can get to the point where you can say to your sister-in-law, "I don't blame you for opting out."

Holidays are microcosms of life. You figure out what you want, gauge what others want, try to reconcile them, then attend the result in good cheer.

Email "Tell Me About It": tellme@washpost.com or write: c/o The Washington Post, Style Plus, 1150 15th St., NW, Washington, D.C. 20071.

© 2014 pressofAtlanticCity.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest Movie Trailers

Reader poll

Previous Polls »

Loading…
Want to share your opinion? Post your comments here »