This is for personal, noncommercial use only.

To search archives, visit
pressofatlanticcity.com/archives

Atlantic City homeowner forced to sell near Revel wants better price

Print this Article  
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Carmen Mollineaux, left, and her mother, Nevella Hancock, stand outside their renovated house Tuesday in Atlantic City. The Casino Reinvestment and Development Authority is buying 50-plus residential properties for the Southeast Inlet Transportation project. If agreement with Mollineaux can't be reached, the CRDA plans to start eminent domain proceedings.

Photo by: Ben Fogletto

ATLANTIC CITY — Carmen Mollineaux is trying to get what she thinks is a fair deal for her home on the 500 block of Madison Avenue.

She shares the two-story house just off Connecticut with her 79-year-old mother, Nevella Hancock. Having depleted her savings with a $125,000 home renovation, she does not want to move.

She has to, though.

Her house is one of six properties that the Casino Reinvestment and Development Authority will acquire by use of eminent domain if necessary. The properties stand in the way of a road-widening project in the neighborhood surrounding Revel Entertainment Inc.’s megaresort, which is under construction six blocks from Mollineaux’s house.

The CRDA budgeted $13 million to buy more than 60 full or partial properties to widen Connecticut, Delaware, Mediterranean (known as Melrose in some blocks) and Massachusetts avenues. The project is designed to accommodate increased traffic from Revel’s patrons, not to mention the accompanying commercial and residential development.

“This was prior to us knowing CRDA was coming,” she said of her home upgrades. “My mother thought she would live here for the rest of her life, and when that’s the long-term plan, you don’t mind investing everything.”

Mollineaux’s house has changed since she and her mother, daughter, sister and niece moved in 15 years ago.

At the time, the women lived in four bedrooms. Tiny by today’s standards, the home had functioned fine despite its original use as a rooming house.

Mollineaux’s sister moved out after remarrying, as did the children, once grown.

Mollineaux and her mother later decided to improve their home. They converted the four bedrooms to two, but focused on the ground level, replacing the floors and revamping the kitchen and bathroom. Age and chronic illness mainly limit Mollineaux’s mother to the first floor, except when she is sleeping.

Land records put the property’s assessed value at $207,000. The CRDA has offered between $178,000 and $200,000, depending on costs to remediate an underground storage tank that assessors have detected in the backyard. The CRDA has promised to refund the difference to Mollineaux if the removal costs less.

Mollineaux rejected the offer. She wants a better one, but cannot afford to hire an attorney, she said.

Mollineaux wants more money for the renovations, inconvenience of moving and emotional value of the home.

The CRDA has told Mollineaux it cannot fully consider the improvement costs without receipts, which she said she did not keep because she did not expect to need them again.

“We didn’t know,” she said of the impending project’s effects.

State law allows condemnation if it will bring economic benefit to the community. CRDA calculates the sale price based on fair market value as determined by factors including lot size, condition and recent sales of adjacent properties. The authority cannot consider sentimental value, according Chief Operating Officer Susan Thompson.

“It’s not lost on us that acquiring people’s residence is a very, very difficult ordeal ... to go through and negotiate for a home you were not planning to leave,” she said. “We have staff who listen to their desires and listen to their dreams and where their job is and how they get to work.”

The CRDA offers, in some cases, to cover expenses for moving and temporary housing, Thompson said.

“We’ve worked very hard to communicate with people so far,” she said.

The CRDA mailed offers to property owners in August, the first formal notification that they might have to move since talks about the road-widening were made public in 2007.

“We thought when the time came, they would be fair,” Mollineaux said.

So far, owners of 36 parcels have felt the CRDA was fair enough and they have finalized the deals, or are close enough to guarantee a sale, according to CRDA records. But after reaching an impasse in negotiations with Mollineaux and five other property owners, the authority has decided to condemn their land. That group could grow, depending on the outcome of early-stage talks regarding 16 or more tracts, according to documents provided by CRDA attorneys.

Consultant DMJM Harris in May provided the CRDA with a report projecting that an estimated 1,867 vehicles per hour would come up Connecticut Avenue and cross Pacific Avenue at the Saturday night peak traffic period when Revel Entertainment opens in 2011.

Six months later, the authority has bought enough land to start the project early next year. Thompson expects the remaining deals to fall in place afterward, quickly enough to avoid any delays.

But Mollineaux, for one, says she’s not moving. She commissioned a second opinion on the value of her home from an independent appraiser, which came in at $300,000.

“I’ve gone to everybody who has a say-so. My mother is sick,” Mollineaux said. “I’d love to put up a Christmas tree and be OK with where we are.”

_________________________________________________________

Inlet construction costs and details

Phase I

Cost

  • Land acquisition: $13 million
  • Design and inspection: $2.6 million
  • Construction: $36.4 million
  • Total: $42 million

Funding sources

  • Revel Entertainment LLC: $5 million*
  • Casino Reinvestment Development Authority: $20 million
  • South Jersey Transportation Authority: $17 million

Work details: Major road infrastructure, landscaping, acquisition, lighting, resident relocation and site preparation, on Mediterranean from Delaware to Connecticut avenues, on Connecticut from Mediterranean to Oriental avenues, plus portions of Massachusetts Avenue. Plus soft costs for design, engineering, etc.

Status: Proposals due next week. Contract awarded before the end of the year.

Estimated completion date: August 2010

Phase II

Cost: $16 million*

Funding source: Revel

Work details: Enhanced landscaping and lighting in Phase I work area. Road improvements to Metropolitan and New Jersey avenues.

Note: No land acquisition needed.

Status: Pending completion of Phase I

*Refundable via tax credits

Sources: Atlantic City Regional Transportation Plan (DMJM Harris); CRDA Chief Operating Officer Susan Ney Thompson

Contact Emily Previti:

609-272-7221

EPreviti@pressofac.com

/news/press/atlantic_city

18 comments:

  • avatar korvinsnerf (16) posts 11:12 am

    mykexl offered $300,000 I suggest your lawyer contact the press and find this mykexl and sell him the house for 300g's. I'll give you $95,000 for it.

  • avatar cfs3526 (2) posts 8:51 am

    Come on guys, this is fairly good price. At the current market, in that location, $200,000 can buy much bigger house, much bigger. Most houses in that area are selling for 60,000.

  • avatar JIMFROMPA (10) posts 9:17 pm

    Trade her proprty for some of the land down by the Lighthouse and the pick her house up and move it down there. There are business`s that move houses professionally. There a lot of vacant land around the lighthouse. Or move it to Bader Field.

  • avatar JoeBrokeler (101) posts 4:16 pm

    Sinking your entire life savings into a house in that area - not smart Throwing away the receipts - not smart Staring down a public "authority" during the worse of financial times and at the lowest point of tolerance the public has for goverment intrusion...priceless, you go girl.

  • avatar Thrush (334) posts 2:35 pm

    Mr. Move, don't forget that for over two decades the property tax rate stayed stagnant, while the greedy locals kept their hands out hoping for casino subsidies. A huge miscalculation, and the city has looked ever-trashier since then. Greedy casinos vs. greedy residents. Both lost.

  • avatar moverightalong (195) posts 2:19 pm

    I can still recall the time before Casinos came and the first time it was shot down. My future wife was working at Steinbecks at shore mall, my X now I use to meet her at Dunkin Donuts after work and people use to talk about the great jobs & money that was going to be made. I stated at the time you will eat them words it will be to expensive to live on the island let alone buy. My in laws had two rooming houses on Montpelier Ave between Atl. & Pacific Av. When Steve Wynn, came into town my inlaws sold their properties for a tidy sum, & got the hell out of AC Greed is one thing, grant you but people have to realize AC is done take what you can get & go South. As far as her taking the savings and putting it into the house I feel sorry for her but live & learn

  • avatar B4real (371) posts 12:46 pm

    They should relocate the lady to a comparable house in the area. Basically this house is in no mans land. She even has bars on her windows. There's no way she'd get anyone to buy her place for the peak-of-the market assessment of $200k let alone $300k. The contractor that did the job should easily be able to verify the $125k she supposedly spent on the renovations. Although eminent domain is a touchy subject you have to weigh the cost benefit between getting the Revel open and accessible and bringing thousands of jobs at a time when A.C. is circling the drain versus saving a few houses in a urban wasteland.

  • avatar Thrush (334) posts 12:21 pm

    "... and now greedy corporation wants to swindle this lady out of her property." -- since when is CRDA a "greedy corporation"? It's an "authority," as its name TELLS you, just like the Xway and GSP. and if it WERE what you say, what does that make you, and the Atlantic City underclass that demands CRDA be everything and do everything it can for the A.C. poverty class? (24% of residents.) The lesson: don't bite the hand that feeds you.

  • avatar mykexl (2) posts 10:38 am

    eminent domain? What a CRIME!! Wouldn't "fair Market" be determined by what the buyer is willing to pay? I thought the American dream was to buy low and sell high? She choose to buy that property when it had little value and now greedy corporation wants to swindle this lady out of her property. I would tie it up in court as long as I could. FIGHT THEM!!! Also, it seems they really want this property so its value increases based on the demand! PS I'll give give you 300k!!!

  • avatar STONECRAB (47) posts 7:14 am

    PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION . COM HELPS HOMEOWNERS FIGHT ILLEGAL EMMINENT DOMAIN ! ANYONE AROUND WHO STILL REMEMBERS PAULINE"S PRAIRE ? LOOK IT UP .

  • avatar whyoknabth (151) posts 12:06 am

    So if this is what the fair market value of this home is, the City owes her a refund for overpaying her taxes? This home was recently re-assessed, so that should be the fair market value. I hope a lawyer offers this lady help.

  • avatar Tin Lizzy (150) posts 9:47 pm

    rarely are the words "decent" and "lawyers" found in such close proximity. No matter. Let's await their pro bono call to help! Meantime, I have a lightly-used bridge I want to sell you.

  • avatar iggern (30) posts 9:42 pm

    This coming from the city that just had a revaluation jacked up everyones taxes,her property comes in at 207,000 and they offered her 200,000.That takes balls.First of all its private property and she should decide the fair market value of her property.After all it was her sweat equity that went into her property not the government.Take them to court, tie them up in litigation and appeals for years.The first thing they did wrong was to insult her with such a low ball number.

  • avatar joisey (238) posts 9:11 pm

    this is absolutely highway robbery!!!!!! I would like to tell you to hold out for money but wouldn't that be taking chances with eminent domain? Aren't there any decent lawyers left out there that would help this family not get ripped off?

  • avatar Barry McSame (136) posts 6:36 pm

    Bernie's dreaming. Take the money and run. without a lawyer, you're spinning wheels. Thank God you have CRDA to buy you out, about the only critters putting deposits on new homes in A.C. are seagulls and pigeons. "The [pigeons] you will always have with you."

  • avatar RandomX856 (158) posts 6:31 pm

    Change of heart, Bernie? Last week you were blasting African Americans, saying that they were the reason why A.C. is the dump that you claim it to be. I agree, finding a house THAT close to the beach for under 1/2 million dollars isn't possible. MORE MONEY!!

  • avatar loveall (50) posts 6:18 pm

    I agree with Bernie but also get at least a half a Million cash if not a Million !!

  • avatar BernieSchwartz (645) posts 6:11 pm

    Hold out Sister! Tell them you want the same size house, a block from beach, ready to move-in. Tell the CRDA to pick out ten houses fitting that criteria, pick one, then tell CRDA to buy for you. This is fair and the CRDA will have no defense. Hell, they spent 100 miilion on new facades and are planning a 25 million dollar parking lot, they can afford to give you more.

PressofAtlanticCity.com offers everyone the opportunity to comment on published stories. However, it is impractical for editors to screen all comments.
If you believe a comment is offensive, please click on the abuse-reporting link and your objection will be considered by an editor. We encourage participants to use their real names, but inoffensive screen names are acceptable. Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them.
Please post responsibly. Do not post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy.
Be polite. Don’t hate. Users who don’t play by the rules may be blocked from participating.

View our full terms of service and privacy agreement

Click here to report a comment as abusive.

Events Calendar