This is for personal, noncommercial use only.

To search archives, visit
pressofatlanticcity.com/archives

New Jersey teacher loses pay over 4-minute phone call

Print this Article  
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Related Links

TRENTON - A four-minute personal cell phone call made during a class may cost an Asbury Park performing arts teacher more than $50,000, but she won't lose her job.

State Education Commissioner Lucille Davy has agreed with an administrative law judge's recommendation that Desly Getty, a veteran teacher at Asbury Park High School in Monmouth County, should be reprimanded and forfeit 120 days' salary as sufficient penalty for the phone call and its repercussions.

The incident, a cautionary tale about the use of technology in schools in the digital age, may have gone unreported. But a student in the class videotaped other students dancing in the classroom while Getty was on the phone, then posted the video on YouTube.

Getty was reprimanded by the school principal, and tenure charges were later filed by the school board to remove her from her job for conduct unbecoming a teacher, failure to supervise students and violating the district's cell phone policy.

State law does not require that school districts adopt policies on teacher cell phone use, but New Jersey School Boards Association spokesman Frank Belluscio said they advise boards to have such policies, and can provide samples to districts. He cited Paramus and Jackson as models. While most districts have policies prohibiting student use of cell phones in school, Belluscio said they estimate most districts do not have policies that directly address faculty use of cell phones.

But Belluscio said in an e-mail that district policies regarding faculty conduct also include "unprofessional behavior" clauses that could include making nonemergency cell phone calls or text messaging while performing job-related duties.

Asbury Park does have a cell phone use policy that allows staff to make personal calls during their free period or lunch break outside the presence of students. It specifically states that personal calls cannot be made while performing assigned school responsibilities except in emergency situations.

Court records show that Getty was covering for another teacher for a 45 minute period Jan. 10, 2008. Students had been assigned a test, but many had apparently finished it during the first part of the 80-minute class. While she was at the desk, Getty placed a cell phone call to the district's suspended superintendent Antonio Lewis. While she was on the phone, two students danced in front of her desk and between her and the class. Another student played music on his cell phone and recorded the dancing with a digital camera, then posted an almost two minute edited version on YouTube.

The following school day after Getty became aware of the video, she went back into the classroom and began questioning students about who made it, records show. This action reportedly caused significant disruption in the class for about a half-hour, and when the administration learned of the matter, a reprimand was issued.

The reprimand cited Getty for not maintaining control of the class, violating the district's cell phone use policy, and causing embarrassment to the district through the YouTube posting.

Getty, who had no prior disciplinary issues, acknowledged that she used poor judgment in placing the call to Lewis, whom she described as her mentor. Getty also serves as a court liaison for juveniles, and said she had called Lewis to ask him for advice about a case.

In his recommendation, Judge Jeff S. Masin said Getty's conduct was "less than what was expected from an experienced, tenured teacher," and "fell bellow the standard of conduct that the district was entitled to expect from her." But, he added that while he is aware of the responsibility that rests on teachers as role models, he felt that the incident was not severe enough to require termination. Davy agreed.

Getty can appeal the decision to the Appellate Court. A call to her attorney, Stephen B. Hunter, was not returned Monday.

E-mail Diane D'Amico:

DDamico@pressofac.com

/news/press/new_jersey

16 comments:

  • avatar keptsimple (1) posts 8:43 pm

    I can see the future,school gets sued by Teachers Union and she gets her 50g's back and we get to give her a little $$$$ bonus for her trouble. It's a win win!

  • avatar Joseph_Bruno (3) posts 1:26 pm

    I'm not a big fan of teachers in many cases as they went from underpaid to getting more money then police and firefighters in many cases, but comeon isn't this a bit ridiculous? How about we just treat them like everyone else, no special perks or privledges and no outlandish penalties. A couple of minute cell phone call does not even warrant a suspension or fine of that amount (if everything reported is accurate). A written repremand, even a couple hours pay (hey how about making her serve detention?) but $50,000.

  • avatar hadenough (136) posts 8:26 pm

    Maybe she was calling the parents of the dancing clowns to come and get them out of her class...Take the dam cell phones, I-Pods and every other electronic device from the kids and put god back in the schools...Teach English and only English...Make them say the pledge of alligiance and say a prayer before class....

  • avatar Aceface (3) posts 9:27 pm

    Aside from the wrong doing of the teacher....it would seem to me that all of the students should have been taken to the wood shed as well as they were clearly using their phones as well....maybe it is time to let the teachers teach..seize all phones...if you need to reach someone at the school...do it the old fashion way...call the office and remove the person from the class...Iwould like to know what happened to the posting student...how hard were their knuckles rapped.... JMO

  • avatar UncleFrank (232) posts 6:24 pm

    When are we going to see fines and penalties for poor teaching performance?

  • avatar fiona6 (3) posts 3:05 pm

    The teacher in the case should not have placed the phone call but the punishment is severe. I agree with the comments about the politicians and the poor behavior of children today. The comments about NJEA are ridiculous. How has NJEA damaged NJ? Thanks to NJEA members, NJ public schools are tops in the nation!

  • avatar zebra2 (109) posts 1:15 pm

    Im sure the parents of these dancers are very proud of their talented children. Im sure they all got excellent grades on their tests!!!

  • avatar kennedy (204) posts 11:30 am

    where's the progressive discipline here? the penalty won't stand up on appeal.

  • avatar amberi (13) posts 11:14 am

    There is where our hard-earned taxes go. About 60% of your property taxes go to the school. The irony about this case was that she was actually caught one time. Who knows how many times she's gotten away with this or other infractions.

  • avatar vwsteve (99) posts 10:17 am

    OK...now, fess up...who did this woman tick off to have to face such extreme disciplinary circumstances..?..I'm not condoning her behavior in any capacity...but the story does state that she is a tenured teacher with no prior disciplinary action taken against her....but on the other hand I like what I see here.....swift and harsh punishment to a state employee that conducts themselves in a...let me get this right now..."less than what was expected" manner....how about applying this type of swift justice to the cretinlike politicians that set the standards for crushing expectations and setting new lows for conduct. Give this teacher a break...seriously. Sure....discipline her accordlingly but let the punishment fit the "crime" here.

  • avatar Chumley (165) posts 8:02 am

    Good! NJEA has damaged NJ and doesn't care about our children's education. NJEA is only about supporting the bloated educational pyramid scam.

  • avatar gingers (1) posts 8:01 am

    This clearly is a personal strike, since the teacher was speaking to the district suspended superintendent. Take a ride down to Wildwood School district to see the administrators taking personal phone calls during meetings with parents, staff members and students; on both personal and school cell phones.

  • avatar Earguy (1) posts 7:10 am

    Anyone have a link to the video?

  • avatar freespeech (66) posts 6:32 am

    It would be great if we could come down as hard on our crooked politicians! No that will never happen in the NJ will it?

  • avatar Joe--- (191) posts 6:30 am

    I too have no love for the NJEA. However, what the heck does the NJEA have to do with this story. Not once is it mentioned in the article. It was handled by the Dept. of Education and an Administrative Law Judge. Hopefully, an example has been made and this type of unprofessional activity will become a thing of the past.

  • avatar RussOCNJ (34) posts 10:34 pm

    The NJEA is draining this State dry with one scam after another ... who cares about a YouTube video? The NJEA is the embarassment.

PressofAtlanticCity.com offers everyone the opportunity to comment on published stories. However, it is impractical for editors to screen all comments.
If you believe a comment is offensive, please click on the abuse-reporting link and your objection will be considered by an editor. We encourage participants to use their real names, but inoffensive screen names are acceptable. Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them.
Please post responsibly. Do not post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy.
Be polite. Don’t hate. Users who don’t play by the rules may be blocked from participating.

View our full terms of service and privacy agreement

Click here to report a comment as abusive.

Events Calendar