The nonstop news about lost Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 has taught us something about our 21st-century selves.

We are surrounded by our personal high-tech indulgences and necessities. We drive cars with OnStar technology that enables someone to locate us every moment. Our GPS devices enable us to find any place, any time. Our smartphones, tablets and laptops can talk to one another anywhere on Earth via Wi-Fi that links with orbiting satellites and stores data in clouds, for goodness sake.

But rescuers hunted for Malaysia Flight 370 almost the same way we hunted for Amelia Earhart's plane.

Radar technology is basically old and hasn't helped much. The airplane's transponder (that at least tells the ground where it is) was either manually turned off or stopped functioning in mid-flight.

So the experts have told us it comes down to this: The only sure way to know what happened to a missing plane is to first find it. Then maybe you'll find the black box that can tell you what really happened to the plane. Or maybe not.

And we've become aware of one more tech gap that's perhaps even more off-putting (see also: terrifying). In many exotic places around the planet, we are still protecting ourselves from the possibility that evil-doers may be traveling with fake identities and stolen passports about as well as we protected ourselves in the run-up to Sept. 11, 2001.

Malaysia Airlines employees apparently failed to check manually their daily worldwide list of stolen passports and compare them with their Flight 370 manifest. Now we know two passengers were not the Europeans their passports said they were - they were Iranians, using passports the world knew were stolen in Thailand.

Whoa. What the hell is the matter with us?

Why haven't our leaders and experts done a better job of safeguarding us with 21st-century travel technology when we fly? And, since we are asking, why haven't those of us in the news media - who play roles of watchdogs and agenda-setters - alerted the post-9/11 world to these gaps?

Let's start with the stolen passports. If you lose your ticket to a football game, you can tell authorities and no one will be able to enter the theater or stadium with your ticket.

Airline computer systems must be reprogrammed so passengers using stolen passports will be automatically red-flagged and prevented from boarding a plane. It can be done - now. Our safety cannot depend upon an airline employee's human error, laziness or criminal indifference.

Now, about those black boxes. It is absurd that the world was put into a position where it has no reliable info on where Malaysia Airlines plane was flying when it went down.

But we also now know that there is far more we can do.

While airlines in the United States are required to have an emergency locator transmitter, the International Civil Aviation Organization, which sets global standards for emergency locator transmitters, cannot mandate that all countries require their use in airlines.

"The Federal Aviation Administration wants to transition to a next-generation air traffic control system that uses satellites to keep tabs on planes," Brian Fung wrote in Tuesday's Washington Post. The new technology, replacing our World War II era's radar technology, is called NextGen. It can monitor wide expanses, including oceans. It can work along with another system called "automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast," with which planes can use satellites to transmit system information instantly back to air controllers.

In the meantime, passengers could have used cellphones to transmit information via wi-fi, except for one problem. Their Malaysia Airlines plane didn't have wi-fi.

All of this could have already been put into practice if our leaders had taken the initiative. And that might have happened if our agenda-setters in the media had recognized the importance of their work.

But we are all lagging. Fung's Post piece wasn't even a news story. It was a blog, titled "The Switch." Since readers may never have spotted it online, the newspaper's editors at least reprinted it Tuesday - in a narrow column on Page A13.

If that important piece had run at the top of Page One, who knows? Maybe even members of Congress might have read it and been motivated to act on it.

Martin Schram, a columnist for McClatchy-Tribune, is a veteran Washington journalist. Readers can send him email at

Distributed by MCT Information Services

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.