This is for personal, noncommercial use only.
As a member of the state Fish and Game Council, I'd like to respond to the the June 1 article, "More bear sightings, fewer problems across the state."
The claim that there has been a decline in the most dangerous types of bear incidents attributable to the state's non-lethal bear-management program is not supported by fact. Bear incident reports compiled by the Department of Environmental Protection through May 20 of this year indicate that the most serious complaints (Category I) actually increased by 14.5 percent compared with the same period last year. These complaints include home entries and attempted entries, livestock and pet kills, vehicle entries and aggressive bear behavior.
The author also mentioned that only six bears have been euthanized for threatening or dangerous behavior this year compared with 30 last year. This is not a valid comparison. The actual number of bears euthanized through May of this year was the same as last year. Since many of the recent reported bear incidents were of a very serious nature, such as entering homes and killing livestock, it is likely that additional bears will have to be euthanized through the summer and fall. Additionally, the total number of sightings and damage and nuisance complaints recorded by the DEP exceeds the totals recorded last year for the same period.
Public education, adverse conditioning, enforcement of the ban on feeding bears and bear-proofing garbage containers are important non-lethal approaches to minimizing bear-human conflicts. However, these approaches have not reduced an already-high level of bear-human conflicts or controlled the increasing bear population in northwestern New Jersey.
DAVID BURKE
Galloway Township
Posted in Letters on Saturday, June 27, 2009 3:05 am
3 comments:
Click here to report a comment as abusive.