ATLANTIC CITY — Pat and Alonzo Bailey live in a modest, one-story house two blocks from the bay in Bungalow Park.

The couple say they spend about $2,600 on flood insurance annually, a rate determined by three factors — the elevation of their home, its location in the 100-year floodplain and a lack of flood vents on the foundation.

Starting next October though, the Federal Emergency Management Agency may begin using many more variables to pinpoint exactly how much the Baileys should be paying, using “state-of-the-art” data collection provided by the private sector.

It’s a new system local officials and activists worry could increase premiums for some island residents and burden those least able to afford rising costs.

“So, how will it work?” Pat Bailey asked sitting on her couch Tuesday morning.

Few people outside of the government know for certain.

The federal agency is calling it “Risk Rating 2.0”— a way to give “more accurate rates based on (homeowners’) unique risk,” according to a three-paragraph description on FEMA’s website.

A building’s precise distance from the water and the cost to rebuild a home are among the new measures FEMA will use to figure out more precise payments. Someone living in Venice Park next to the bay may have higher rates than someone living just a few houses further from the water.

A FEMA spokesperson said “multiple” factors will determine a person’s flood insurance.

“By leveraging industry-best practices and technology, FEMA plans to reduce the complexity of buying flood insurance, so that it is as straight-forward as homeowner’s and auto insurance for both agents and applicants,” the website reads.

Reform quitely rolled out

Ocean City insurance agent Tom Heist calls the reform “the biggest thing to happen” to the federal flood insurance program since its inception in the 1970s, and one that has been quietly rolled out.

Heist, owner of Thomas Heist Insurance Agency, said FEMA could use countless characteristics to determine someone’s flood insurance, including the age of the storm drains and bulkheads in a neighborhood, the number of rain events and specific construction qualities of a house.

“It could be thousands of data points,” Heist said. “Is it a house built with average construction qualities or a super- fancy, nice house with elevators? What are the barriers in front of it? Are there dunes? How old are the drainage systems in that municipality?”

Residents in low-elevation homes close to a water source in towns that aren’t taking steps to mitigate flooding could be hurt the most, he said. Heist pointed to parts of Atlantic City as being hit by the changes, such as around Florida and Texas avenues, where there are outdated storm drain systems and crumbling bulkheads.

Meanwhile, Heist said, homeowners with higher structures in communities proactively mitigating flooding could see their rates hold steady or decline.

Property owners in Brigantine, for instance, may have less reason to worry after the city added four pumping stations and refurbished another existing one two years ago.

Why the change?

FEMA has been straddling debt and facing increasing competition from private companies, which Heist said in recent years have begun offering lower flood insurance rates than the government.

Heist’s firm consults with about 10 private insurers to compete against FEMA’s rates. Two years ago, he said, that number was zero.

Private coverage in Ne w Jersey grew by more than $10 million from 2016 to 2017, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence.

“The government is losing policies at a very fast rate,” Heist said. “Is that a good thing or bad thing? I don’t know. But it’s scaring the government, and they want to start acting more like a private insurer.”

Little details have been revealed about FEMA’s new program. Some consider a lack of transparency worrying but are otherwise in support of redoing outdated flood maps to reflect true risk.

Amanda Devecka-Rinear, director of the New Jersey Organizing Project, said her group has been calling for reforms to the National Flood Insurance Program since Hurricane Sandy. In 2016, FEMA reopened thousands of claims from Sandy victims, who officials say were systematically underpaid by vendors that partner with the agency.

Devecka-Rinear is in favor of requiring people living near rivers (not just beaches and bays) to pay into the system, but wants the government to release more details about “Risk Rating 2.0.”

As an administrative change, FEMA’s proposal will not be voted on by Congress. Devecka-Rinear said that’s a problem, and that representatives from states that have recently undergone disasters should have a voice at the table. In Long Island, Sen. Chuck Schumer called on FEMA to put the brakes on its plan until more details are released about it.

“FEMA really isn’t being transparent about its changes. ... We are a very squishy state, so this policy going wrong could be really destabilizing,” said Devecka-Rinear.

Cities can help

Cities can take steps to help residents as FEMA begins the process of phasing out subsidies on some properties by increasing premiums. In Cape May and Atlantic counties, there are more than 80,000 federal flood policies, with the average premium in both counties around $1,500.

Through FEMA’s “Community Rating System,” towns get city-wide discounts for policyholders located in Special Flood Hazard Areas and cushion any potential blow to residents.

The Community Rating System is a voluntary incentive program for municipalities. When towns achieve certain floodplain management activities, such as educating the public about flooding, FEMA gives insurance discounts to residents.

Twelve communities participate in Atlantic County, and of those, all of the barrier-island towns have secured a 25% discount with the exception of Atlantic City, where residents get a 20% discount.

Somers Point officials announced last week that residents qualify for a 25% discount, saving taxpayers collectively more than $185,000 annually. The average annual premium in the city will be reduced to $608.

While some worry about the effects of “Risk Rating 2.0,” Heist is more optimistic.

FEMA, he said, could use its new data to shine a light on which homeowners are in most need of federal aid. The agency could then give subsidies on premiums and money for elevations to those in the worst situations.

“If they’re smart about it, they’d say: ‘Now that we have this big data, it really tells us these are terrible properties,’” Heist said. “’What properties need the most attention?’”

Contact: 609-272-7258 azoppo@pressofac.com Twitter @AvalonZoppo

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

PLEASE BE ADVISED: Soon we will no longer integrate with Facebook for story comments. The commenting option is not going away, however, readers will need to register for a FREE site account to continue sharing their thoughts and feedback on stories. If you already have an account (i.e. current subscribers, posting in obituary guestbooks, for submitting community events), you may use that login, otherwise, you will be prompted to create a new account.

Load comments